I have academics on the brain right now. Specifically, my daughters’ future educations.
We used to live up in a Virginia suburb of Washington, DC and I worked for several years as a fundraiser at a very expensive private school. The parents at this school were by and large an intense group of people and they demanded a great deal from their children and the teachers. After all, they were spending a small fortune on their children’s educations and by god they expected some results. As in, admission to an excellent university, preferably an Ivy. Not only did they expect their kids to do well academically, they also kept the children very busy after school — sports, music lessons, language classes, etc. — all so as to pad their children’s resumes. They started obsessing about their children’s future colleges when the children were still in preschool, as they felt quite strongly that decisions made for a four-year-old could have serious ramifications 14 years later.
This situation isn’t exclusive to the school I worked at; it can be found at schools across the DC area and the Washington Post regularly publishes articles on some variation of this theme. I suspect that one could read similar stories in newspapers in New York, Chicago, Boston, and elsewhere.
One of the many reasons we left the DC area and came back down here to Collegetown is that we didn’t want to raise our children that way. We wanted them to have normal childhoods where they could ride their bikes, splash in mud puddles, or lie in a hammock and dream and not worry about how their so-called loafing would affect their later academic success. We wanted our kids to be kids, not obsessing about what extracurricular activities would get them into Harvard.
This weekend, we visited college friends of ours who live in the DC area. They have a child in fourth grade in a magnet school for the gifted and their second child will start in the third grade there next year. As we always do when we get together, we talked about our children’s schools and what they’ve been up lately. As I was listening to my friends talk, I was struck by how intense life is for their ten-year-old — how much homework she has and at how high a level she is expected to perform academically. These are not only the teachers’ expectations, but also the parents’. The parents don’t seem to think it’s unreasonable for their ten-year-old daughter to spend an hour or two on her homework every night. (Studies show that about 40 minutes max would be appropriate for a fourth grader.)
Our friends are already thinking ahead to high school and which one they should choose for their children — the one with the International Baccalaureate program or the one with the Advanced Placement program? This choice would affect their children’s high school educations and, beyond that, could impact where they go to college. Listening to our friends, it became very clear to us that they expect their children to take the most academically rigorous program they can handle and we aren’t certain if the children will have any input into this process.
Pete and I, on the other hand, think differently. For starters, we assume that our children will have a strong role in the process of deciding their educational paths. For example, when Graceful is in 5th grade, she’ll be able to choose whether she’ll take Orchestra, Band, Art, or something else. We expect to discuss those options as a family, listen to Graceful’s preferences, and guide her through the decision-making process. This will be a continuing trend as Graceful, and later on Elegant, go through school, and we want the girls to have a say in how they’ll be spending their school years. Obviously, they can’t choose not to take math or science, but they should at least be able to have choices when possible.
Once the girls are in high school the girls will have to decide if they’ll take Advanced Placement classes. Contrary to our friends’ thinking, Pete and I are of the opinion that taking as many A.P. classes as possible is too much and we’d rather that our girls only take A.P. classes in which they are deeply interested in the subject and want to go as far with it as they can. What we don’t want is a daughter with a full load of A.P. classes and who is so stressed and overwhelmed that she has a nervous breakdown by the time she’s 17.
[For a fascinating sociological study of just how stressed out today's high achieving high school students are, read The Overachievers by Alexandra Robbins. It will blow your mind.]
What we’d really like is for our girls to pursue their interests as they go through school and find out what it is that thrills them. Of course they’ll have to take the basics (English, math, sciences, etc.), but we also hope they’ll also pursue their passions — whether it’s music or art or something else entirely. We want them to do the best that they can academically but we don’t want them to stress unduly over their grades or freak out if they get an A- because it might hurt their chances at Yale.
I personally don’t care if either of my daughters goes to Harvard or Princeton or Yale, and I am trying very hard not to care if they go to the University of Virginia, which is where Pete and I went and which is now a very difficult school to get into. What I hope is that the girls will figure out what kind of school they want to go to and then we’ll work together to find out which ones are a right fit.
As I was listening to our friends talk about their plans for their children’s educations, I didn’t explain our thinking as I knew they wouldn’t understand.
It has occurred to me that perhaps our thinking is off. That by not pushing our children we are instead encouraging them to be mediocre. That is not our intent, but maybe we’re not seeing things clearly.
But I’m curious. What do you think? Are we doing right by our children or are we encouraging mediocrity? That is, perhaps, a strong way to state it, but I think you understand what I’m asking. Let me know your thoughts. I look forward to this discussion.